[ Bioenergy ]
|
Saving
Ratepayers
|
INTEREST BURDEN |
|||
Year |
Interest |
Interest Constraint - Expenditure |
Interest Constraint - Revenue |
$million |
$million |
$million |
|
Current |
|||
2000-1 |
3.7 |
16.9 |
16.2 |
Future |
|||
2001-2 |
6.4 |
18.1 |
17.8 |
2002-3 |
10.5 |
19.2 |
19.6 |
2003-4 |
13.2 |
20.0 |
21.1 |
2004-5 |
14.8 |
20.5 |
22.8 |
2005-6 |
15.8 |
20.8 |
24.3 |
2006-7 |
16.5 |
21.1 |
26.0 |
2007-8 |
16.6 |
21.4 |
27.6 |
2008-9 |
16.4 |
21.7 |
29.2 |
2009-10 |
17.1 |
22.0 |
30.7 |
2010-11 |
16.8 |
22.3 |
32.4 |
---------- |
|||
TOTAL |
$ 144.1 million |
Council will take $144 million dollars from ratepayers but not actually apply it to works for the carrying of capital projects in North Shore City. This is more than the total cost of some essential projects. It is no wonder that some will have to be delayed. The $144 million will be paid to financial institutions which will create and issue the debt. What a waste! It is wrong.
It is actually inappropriate for any community to pay such a huge cost to hire new money for its use.What does this level of Interest cost represent for the average ratepayer? Based on current ratepayer numbers, 70,500 it is as shown in the next table.
AVERAGE INTEREST BURDEN |
||
Year |
Total |
Average |
$million |
70,500 payers |
|
Current |
||
2000-1 |
$ 3.7 |
$ 51.82 |
Future |
||
2001-2 |
$ 6.4 |
$ 91.35 |
2002-3 |
$ 10.5 |
$ 148.47 |
2003-4 |
$ 13.2 |
$ 187.04 |
2004-5 |
$ 14.8 |
$ 209.40 |
2005-6 |
$ 15.8 |
$ 224.71 |
2006-7 |
$ 16.5 |
$ 234.62 |
2007-8 |
$ 16.6 |
$ 235.70 |
2008-9 |
$ 16.4 |
$ 232.91 |
2009-10 |
$ 17.1 |
$ 242.62 |
2010-11 |
$ 16.8 |
$ 238.17 |
------------ |
||
Cost to Each Ratepayer |
over next 10 years |
$ 2,044.99 |
It is true that the individual annual cost beyond the second shown year will reduce as ratepayer numbers increase but the rough measure of this interest burden is evident from this table. It is substantial. Your pocket will be hit heavily to pay this. In my view Council must do its utmost to avoid or minimise this burden. It has failed to do so thus far. As one of the payers you must demand of all elected representatives that they do whatever is necessary to minimise this interest cost burden.
Can this be done? The answer is, Yes. It is just a matter of having the right policies implemented. It can be done.
More to come ....
1. Article in NZ Local Government Magazine August 2001. Click here Article 1
2. Correspondence with Reserve Bank
To help you navigate to other sections - [ Bioenergy
] [ Name Badges
]
E mail Tim Leitch here or use my Feedback page - use upper or lower menu links.
|